5 ms·
Gaming-wise, I think the 3090 struggles at 8k and 4k 144hz gaming, which is very high end gaming experience and people that spend the money on those monitors wi
by ftufek 4y ago
Gaming-wise, I think the 3090 struggles at 8k and 4k 144hz gaming, which is very high end gaming experience and people that spend the money on those monitors will spend the money on the 4090.
For other purposes (like scientific computing/ml), while 3090 can do a lot of things that 4090 does, it's half the speed (or even slower) and a lot less energy efficient, say 1x4090 = 2x3090, 4090 uses 450W, dual 3090 uses 700W, of course you can power limit both of them further, but you still get best bang for your buck out of the 4090.
- paulmd 4y agoAlso VR. I know VR people with a 3090 who grumble about it not really being fast enough for them.
- edude03 4y agoWhat games are they running?! While I know not top of the line - I can run the HTC VIVE pro 2 at 5k@120hz at max visual settings in beatsaber on a 2060 based gaming laptop.
- SergeAx 4y agoWhat's your experience with HalfLife Alyx?
- ranguna 4y ago90+ fps on an rtx 2070 super egpu
- badlucklottery 4y ago>beatsaber Beatsaber is a great game but the graphics aren't very stressful (nor do they need to be). Keep in mind people are also starting to mod VR into more and more new PC games that were never designed for it. Stuff like Elden Ring, FF7R, the Resident Evil remakes, etc.
- ahoho 4y agoFor ML, the bottleneck is often memory, which is the same between those cards.