5 ms·

I'm sorry. I have a colleague based out of Venezuela. We've had to work together to get tunnels and vpns configured so that he can get uncensored and secure int

I'm sorry. I have a colleague based out of Venezuela. We've had to work together to get tunnels and vpns configured so that he can get uncensored and secure internet access. But Tor is an enormous source of abusive traffic and if I don't filter it, then that's harmful to site owners. I'm being forced to choose between the needs of people that I know, work with, and depend on financially, and the needs of people in countries with issues that are far outside my ability to resolve. It's not a hard decision.

justsomehnguy 4y ago
> It's not a hard decision. Depends on what you imply under 'hard'. As a IaaS provider I endured alk the hurdles about that and ten years later - I don't care, at least not until my outbound bill is bigger than usual. Like some of the clients are on CentOS6, on a public facing machines.
Zak 4y ago
There are probably more sophisticated options that would solve your problems than simply blocking it.
- judge2020 4y ago
  Such as?
  - cowtools 4y ago
    The answer depends on the type of service you host. I don't know what you need to do, but I do know that filtering IP space is merely security-by-obscurity, it is a cheap and broken solution to the hard problems of sybil resistance. If you need IP filtering to operate on a day-to-day basis, then the security of your service is fundamentally broken. Tor users do not have any special properties over clear-net users besides low accountability for their IP space. There are other ways to acquire this type of setup that don't involve broadcasting a public list of known exit nodes as an act of good faith. Any sophisticated attacker will be able to easily get ahold of the IP space and bandwidth they need to do their work, whether it's through a botnet or simply because they operate out of some less-accountable country like China or Russia. IP filtering: now you have two problems!
    - thaumaturgy 4y ago
      This is why I'm strongly against spam filtering for email. Spam filters are fundamentally security-through-obscurity. I mean, they don't protect your email from targeted bombing attacks or phishing. If you need spam filters to operate your email on a day-to-day basis, then the security of your email is fundamentally broken. /s, obviously, I hope. Blocking Tor isn't a security measure, it's a nuisance reduction measure.
      - cowtools 4y ago
        >This is why I'm strongly against spam filtering for email. Spam filters are fundamentally security-through-obscurity. I mean, they don't protect your email from targeted bombing attacks or phishing. If you need spam filters to operate your email on a day-to-day basis, then the security of your email is fundamentally broken. You kid, but this is completely true Email is simply an incredibly flawed, outdated and broken system, especially when used without PGP. Phishing is a massive problem, and it has only continued to grow in scale because spam, uh... finds a way. At the same time, spam filters regularly create false positives, making email an unreliable transport (leading "oops, it got lost in my spam folder"). >Blocking Tor isn't a security measure, it's a nuisance reduction measure. You should block all IP space, this will reduce nuisances by 100%. In fact, this will save you from having to consider any real security practices or do your job properly.
        thaumaturgy 4y ago
      - matjet 4y ago
        The correct analogy here would be implementing spam filtering by blocking large segments of email addresses. Eg, dropping mail from all non microsoft/gmail domains (as a nuisance reduction measure!), with predictable impact on smaller providers and self hosted email.
        plumeria 4y ago
- plumeria 4y ago
  Is using CAPTCHAs one of those?
  - Schroedingersat 4y ago
    Most captcha services are just used to force users identified as having few other options into giving free tagging labour.
  - throwaway0x7E6 4y ago
    captchas are fine. recaptcha is not. between 2015 and ~2020, my home ISP was blessed with every recaptcha being 3 rounds of slow fade-in bullshit. I have also seen infuriating gaslighting of "please try again" after certainly correct solutions, as well as 5+ rounds followed by a notification that my network is entirely blocked. I've developed a reflex to Ctrl+W upon seeing it, unless that is absolutely vital for me to get past it - which is exceedingly rare. if I had a genie lamp, I'd waste one of my 3 wishes to do terrible things to the people responsible for that shit.
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
parroteal 4y ago
I'm a noob, can you give me a pointer? What kind of abusive traffic is coming through Tor and why do they do it?
- judge2020 4y ago
  https://blog.cloudflare.com/the-trouble-with-tor/ https://blog.cloudflare.com/the-trouble-with-tor/ > . Based on data across the CloudFlare network, 94% of requests that we see across the Tor network are per se malicious. That doesn’t mean they are visiting controversial content, but instead that they are automated requests designed to harm our customers. A large percentage of the comment spam, vulnerability scanning, ad click fraud, content scraping, and login scanning comes via the Tor network. To give you some sense, based on data from Project Honey Pot, 18% of global email spam, or approximately 6.5 trillion unwanted messages per year, begin with an automated bot harvesting email addresses via the Tor network.
- remus 4y ago
  Say you're running an account take over script that spams login forms with a list of known username and password combos. If a website owner sees thousands of login attempts coming from a single IP address they're likely to block you to prevent abuse on their website. This is annoying for you as you then need to rotate your IP address. Using tor hides your IP address from the website and makes switching exit nodes very straightforward, so you can run your account take over script in peace.
  - viraptor 4y ago
    That's not that easy in practice. There's less than 2k exits normally, not all of them usable. Your abuse script competed with other malicious traffic for those exits and their reputation gets burned pretty much immediately. So yes, you can switch exits easily, but effectively your switching from one known bad IP to another bad IP.
- thaumaturgy 4y ago
  Mainly forms -- login forms, comment forms, signup forms. Bots use Tor pretty heavily because it's anonymous and hard to block them without blocking the entire network. Login form abuse is mildly irritating but not a huge deal if you have other measures in place. Comment spam is annoying but there are some options that deal with it pretty well. But the signup spam was a headache. I didn't want to just blackhole Tor traffic, and tried to reduce the abuse with other tools, including some custom stuff. The final straw was a customer's small business site that had a MailChimp or Constant Contact signup form. Those vendors want you to embed their code by default to render the form, so you have less control over the form itself. There were workarounds, but they all sucked. Tor bots would sign up email addresses through this newsletter form, and then I'd have to go through and manually scrub them before newsletters went out, or the service would penalize my client for too many bounces/unsubscribes/complaints. Very nearly 100% of the abuse on that particular form came from Tor IPs. I do not want to spend my limited time on this Earth manually sorting out bots from humans because of one particular network. Blackholing Tor made that problem disappear immediately. VPNs are dime-a-dozen now, cheap VPSs are available from lots of vendors, there's Wireguard, there's ssh, a clever person could even set up Apache or nginx as a forward proxy with ssl from LetsEncrypt. Tor is well over 90% abusive traffic (https://blog.cloudflare.com/the-trouble-with-tor/ https://blog.cloudflare.com/the-trouble-with-tor/). This is a Tor problem, not a me problem. There are better alternatives available.

justsomehnguy 4y ago

> It's not a hard decision. Depends on what you imply under 'hard'. As a IaaS provider I endured alk the hurdles about that and ten years later - I don't care, at least not until my outbound bill is bigger than usual. Like some of the clients are on CentOS6, on a public facing machines.

Zak 4y ago

There are probably more sophisticated options that would solve your problems than simply blocking it.

judge2020 4y ago
Such as?
- cowtools 4y ago
  The answer depends on the type of service you host. I don't know what you need to do, but I do know that filtering IP space is merely security-by-obscurity, it is a cheap and broken solution to the hard problems of sybil resistance. If you need IP filtering to operate on a day-to-day basis, then the security of your service is fundamentally broken. Tor users do not have any special properties over clear-net users besides low accountability for their IP space. There are other ways to acquire this type of setup that don't involve broadcasting a public list of known exit nodes as an act of good faith. Any sophisticated attacker will be able to easily get ahold of the IP space and bandwidth they need to do their work, whether it's through a botnet or simply because they operate out of some less-accountable country like China or Russia. IP filtering: now you have two problems!
  - thaumaturgy 4y ago
    This is why I'm strongly against spam filtering for email. Spam filters are fundamentally security-through-obscurity. I mean, they don't protect your email from targeted bombing attacks or phishing. If you need spam filters to operate your email on a day-to-day basis, then the security of your email is fundamentally broken. /s, obviously, I hope. Blocking Tor isn't a security measure, it's a nuisance reduction measure.
    - cowtools 4y ago
      >This is why I'm strongly against spam filtering for email. Spam filters are fundamentally security-through-obscurity. I mean, they don't protect your email from targeted bombing attacks or phishing. If you need spam filters to operate your email on a day-to-day basis, then the security of your email is fundamentally broken. You kid, but this is completely true Email is simply an incredibly flawed, outdated and broken system, especially when used without PGP. Phishing is a massive problem, and it has only continued to grow in scale because spam, uh... finds a way. At the same time, spam filters regularly create false positives, making email an unreliable transport (leading "oops, it got lost in my spam folder"). >Blocking Tor isn't a security measure, it's a nuisance reduction measure. You should block all IP space, this will reduce nuisances by 100%. In fact, this will save you from having to consider any real security practices or do your job properly.
      - thaumaturgy 4y ago
    - matjet 4y ago
      The correct analogy here would be implementing spam filtering by blocking large segments of email addresses. Eg, dropping mail from all non microsoft/gmail domains (as a nuisance reduction measure!), with predictable impact on smaller providers and self hosted email.
      - plumeria 4y ago
plumeria 4y ago
Is using CAPTCHAs one of those?
- Schroedingersat 4y ago
  Most captcha services are just used to force users identified as having few other options into giving free tagging labour.
- throwaway0x7E6 4y ago
  captchas are fine. recaptcha is not. between 2015 and ~2020, my home ISP was blessed with every recaptcha being 3 rounds of slow fade-in bullshit. I have also seen infuriating gaslighting of "please try again" after certainly correct solutions, as well as 5+ rounds followed by a notification that my network is entirely blocked. I've developed a reflex to Ctrl+W upon seeing it, unless that is absolutely vital for me to get past it - which is exceedingly rare. if I had a genie lamp, I'd waste one of my 3 wishes to do terrible things to the people responsible for that shit.
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]

parroteal 4y ago

I'm a noob, can you give me a pointer? What kind of abusive traffic is coming through Tor and why do they do it?

judge2020 4y ago
https://blog.cloudflare.com/the-trouble-with-tor/ https://blog.cloudflare.com/the-trouble-with-tor/ > . Based on data across the CloudFlare network, 94% of requests that we see across the Tor network are per se malicious. That doesn’t mean they are visiting controversial content, but instead that they are automated requests designed to harm our customers. A large percentage of the comment spam, vulnerability scanning, ad click fraud, content scraping, and login scanning comes via the Tor network. To give you some sense, based on data from Project Honey Pot, 18% of global email spam, or approximately 6.5 trillion unwanted messages per year, begin with an automated bot harvesting email addresses via the Tor network.
remus 4y ago
Say you're running an account take over script that spams login forms with a list of known username and password combos. If a website owner sees thousands of login attempts coming from a single IP address they're likely to block you to prevent abuse on their website. This is annoying for you as you then need to rotate your IP address. Using tor hides your IP address from the website and makes switching exit nodes very straightforward, so you can run your account take over script in peace.
- viraptor 4y ago
  That's not that easy in practice. There's less than 2k exits normally, not all of them usable. Your abuse script competed with other malicious traffic for those exits and their reputation gets burned pretty much immediately. So yes, you can switch exits easily, but effectively your switching from one known bad IP to another bad IP.
thaumaturgy 4y ago
Mainly forms -- login forms, comment forms, signup forms. Bots use Tor pretty heavily because it's anonymous and hard to block them without blocking the entire network. Login form abuse is mildly irritating but not a huge deal if you have other measures in place. Comment spam is annoying but there are some options that deal with it pretty well. But the signup spam was a headache. I didn't want to just blackhole Tor traffic, and tried to reduce the abuse with other tools, including some custom stuff. The final straw was a customer's small business site that had a MailChimp or Constant Contact signup form. Those vendors want you to embed their code by default to render the form, so you have less control over the form itself. There were workarounds, but they all sucked. Tor bots would sign up email addresses through this newsletter form, and then I'd have to go through and manually scrub them before newsletters went out, or the service would penalize my client for too many bounces/unsubscribes/complaints. Very nearly 100% of the abuse on that particular form came from Tor IPs. I do not want to spend my limited time on this Earth manually sorting out bots from humans because of one particular network. Blackholing Tor made that problem disappear immediately. VPNs are dime-a-dozen now, cheap VPSs are available from lots of vendors, there's Wireguard, there's ssh, a clever person could even set up Apache or nginx as a forward proxy with ssl from LetsEncrypt. Tor is well over 90% abusive traffic (https://blog.cloudflare.com/the-trouble-with-tor/ https://blog.cloudflare.com/the-trouble-with-tor/). This is a Tor problem, not a me problem. There are better alternatives available.