I guess that's one way to put it. But skipping the conclusions means that we don't know what, if anything, they are doing differently to solve these issues. Ju

I guess that's one way to put it. But skipping the conclusions means that we don't know what, if anything, they are doing differently to solve these issues. Just telling someone "trust us, you'll regret it if you don't follow our advice" isn't exactly a compelling argument. I'ma also not sure PG is trying to use a literary device, as you suggest. His normal writing style is very candid, so it would be surprising if he were all of a sudden burying (omitting?) the lede here.