5 ms·
$1599 for 4090, $1199 for 4080 16GB, $899 for 4080 12GB (aka 4070). See Nvidia's News page for the announcement. Edit: Apologies, got the 4080 numbers wrong, a
by babel_ 4y ago
$1599 for 4090, $1199 for 4080 16GB, $899 for 4080 12GB (aka 4070). See Nvidia's News page for the announcement.
Edit: Apologies, got the 4080 numbers wrong, accidentally used GBP, corrected above. For the curious, the 4080 16GB is £1269, the 4080 12GB is £949. Meanwhile, the 4090 is £1679.
- highwaylights 4y agoRDNA 3 it is then I guess.
- cbg0 4y agoWhy do you assume those will be cheap?
- COGlory 4y agoWell for starters, they can't run CUDA which hugely limits their enterprise market
- belthesar 4y agoDuring the shortage, AMD kept their reference units at MSRP (I was able to pick up a 6800 XT at $649 through sheer luck when others I knew were spending upwards of $1200 on GPUs). With supply loosening up, I expect AMD will continue to play the good guy to steal market share and keep prices sane in comparison to Nvidia's play.
- paulmd 4y agoNVIDIA kept founders edition cards at MSRP too. what implication are you trying to draw from that as far as whether MSRP is good or not?
- spookie 4y agoYou could buy GPUs directly from AMD, which also had measures in place to ensure no scalpers had the upper hand. This would happen at a certain time of a certain day almost every week, so you could get one if you were patient enough. Meanwhile NVIDIA stopped production pre-holiday season last year in an attempt to bolster their company value to 1 trillion dollars. Quite a risky play that didn't pay off [1]. [1] https://www.notebookcheck.net/Nvidia-allegedly-halting-RTX-3000-production-this-October-to-keep-prices-as-high-as-possible-until-1H22.573312.0.html https://www.notebookcheck.net/Nvidia-allegedly-halting-RTX-3...
- paulmd 4y agoAMD outsources it to DigitalRiver, NVIDIA has done that in the past but this time they outsourced to BestBuy (with contractual requirements to sell at MSRP). Both BestBuy and AMD take some nominal measures against bots but it's always been a problem for both sites. > Meanwhile NVIDIA stopped production pre-holiday season last year in an attempt to bolster their company value to 1 trillion dollars. Quite a risky play that didn't pay off [1]. The source for that article MLID and wasn't borne out by actual production numbers. Actually there was a nominal rise in shipments in holiday '21. https://www.jonpeddie.com/press-releases/q421-sees-a-nominal-rise-in-gpu-and-pc-shipments-quarter-to-quarter/ https://www.jonpeddie.com/press-releases/q421-sees-a-nominal... Also, we're currently in a huge glut so obviously there was no availability problem in early Q1 '22 or Q2 '22 either - like, why is pulling back production for 2022 a bad thing, when you're already sitting on a huge stockpile of chips? Were they supposed to keep cranking and make the glut even worse? People take these techtubers as gospel and a lot of what they say just ends up somewhere between slanted perspective and factually incorrect. But people are willing to believe literally anything as long as it paints NVIDIA in a bad light - just like people went from being absolutely sure that partners were scalping gpus and selling right into mining farms, but then the EVGA CEO says he didn't make any money at all during the mining boom and NVIDIA was capping prices and forcing him to sell at a loss suddenly everyone forgets about the board partners selling $2,000 3080s in their first-party stores. Or the "800-900w TGP" rumors for 4080 that ended up being off by double. https://videocardz.com/newz/flagship-nvidia-ada-sku-might-feature-18176-cores-48gb-memory-and-800w-tdp https://videocardz.com/newz/flagship-nvidia-ada-sku-might-fe... There is just a ton of anti-nvidia sentiment in general and it completely distorts everyone's perception of reality. People will believe any random thing, even if it disagrees with common sense, or their own personal observations, as long as it scratches that "green man bad" itch. And there is a whole little cottage industry of people like MLID and kopite7kimi who thrive on catering to it for clicks. Once those negative frames get started, they don't go away, even if the information used to construct them later turns out to be false. But people rushing to the defense of poor board partners who say they didn't make any money at all during the crypto boom, heck we actually lost money really takes the cake imo, like that's either actual goldfish-tier memory or massive "green man bad" brain, take your pick. They're the ones who handle sales of all the mining cards too - NVIDIA doesn't run that directly either, it's all partners. https://videocardz.com/newz/first-nvidia-cmp-crypto-mining-processor-has-been-pictured https://videocardz.com/newz/first-nvidia-cmp-crypto-mining-p...
- 7speter 4y agoNot the person you responded to, but rumors, and also, none of AMD's board partners have come out and said they are gonna stop making AMD boards, especially none of the AMD exclusive board partners like EVGA did last week.
- meragrin_ 4y agoBecause the demand for AMD graphics cards has never been all that great. AMD cards languished on the shelves when there was no RTX card to be found. I mean the RX 6650 XT can be found for the price of an RTX 3050. They have been that price for a bit now. If price to performance were a thought to the majority of people buying cards, there would be no way that would be the case. Obviously, gaming performance is not the only consideration. I've been wanting a new graphics card for some time now. I won't pay the Nvidia/miner tax and AMD does not provide one with easy machine learning access.
- UberFly 4y agoI suspect there will be a lot of voting with your wallet this time around.