3 ms·
Unless the number of partners also grew in proportion to the number of startups. Then the partners had 33% more startups to learn, but they were scheduled for
by pavon 4y ago
Unless the number of partners also grew in proportion to the number of startups.
Then the partners had 33% more startups to learn, but they were scheduled for 33% fewer meetings with each startup, so the total number of meetings needed for all the partners to learn all the startups was O(P*S) which is O(N^2), since P&S are both proportional to N, so it took quadratically longer for that familiarity to occur.