3 ms·
The 4080/4090 pages have the prices. 4080 12GB: $900 4080 16GB: $1200 4090: $1600
by ihuman 4y ago
The 4080/4090 pages have the prices.
4080 12GB: $900
4080 16GB: $1200
4090: $1600
- blagie 4y agoThat specs make it seem like these wouldn't be quite worth it at launch. Ampere specs: https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/graphics-cards/compare/ https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/graphics-cards/compare/ This looks like a smaller bump than Ampere. 3090 seems cheaper and better than 4080. As people have pointed out, what I'd really like is more / upgradeable RAM. NVidia is trying to not compete with their higher-end cards, but ML tools are increasingly consumer.
- omegalulw 4y agoI would like to see independent benchmarks for 4090 before making judgements. "2-4x" as claimed over 3090 Ti is not a small bump.
- Jackson__ 4y ago2-4X in video games, when using DLSS with their new frame interpolation technique. It kinda feels like cheating.
- noahtallen 4y agoIf it’s not visually distinguishable, it won’t matter. I hear recent versions of DLSS are very good at 4k despite earlier versions having some bad artifacts. I guess we’ll have to wait for the reviews :)
- Jackson__ 4y agoI guess it depends on your definition if distinguishable, but as someone who has dabbled with most ML frame interpolation techniques, this appears just as artifact ridden. https://i.imgur.com/9U9HIpH.jpeg https://i.imgur.com/9U9HIpH.jpeg
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- Beermotor 4y agoYeah I'm going to call this a hard pass until I see third-party benchmarks, power draw numbers, and what AMD has with RDNA3. This is starting to look like a repeat of Geforce FX vs Radeon 9700 Pro all over again.