Meh. I agree with the sentiment, but in practice, I’m not sure we’re there yet. Maybe once Rust has a more robust standard library and less language-level churn

Meh. I agree with the sentiment, but in practice, I’m not sure we’re there yet. Maybe once Rust has a more robust standard library and less language-level churn we’ll be there. If you’re writing something safety-critical, sure, use a memory-safe language like Rust/Go/etc. Otherwise, I think C++ is still plenty viable.