4 ms·
I didn't read it that way at all. I read it as: where can we find a lower cost (than C++) pool of developers. It's not particularly conspiratorial. Companies
by lttlrck 4y ago
I didn't read it that way at all.
I read it as: where can we find a lower cost (than C++) pool of developers.
It's not particularly conspiratorial. Companies are always looking to expand their labor force and good C++ devs can be very expensive, so why would you want start a new project in C++? Security is another aspect altogether...
- zozbot234 4y agoCompanies don't care about cost, they care about bang for the buck. And this is where Rust has a clear advantage over C/C++, at least in many cases.