4 ms·
They certainly don't care enough to enforce it. >Dynamically linking to a MIT lib is not the same as distributing an MIT lib Would you mind citing the clause
by deadbeeves 4y ago
They certainly don't care enough to enforce it.
>Dynamically linking to a MIT lib is not the same as distributing an MIT lib
Would you mind citing the clause that makes that distinction?
- schemescape 4y agoI’m not a lawyer and this is not legal advice, but… > The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. When statically linking, you’re including a copy of the software, so you’re required to include the notices. When dynamically linking, you’re not including the software. Seems pretty straight forward to me.
- deadbeeves 4y agoAh, I was assuming you're distributing the dynamic library in the package. That's typically what you do on Windows. If you're not doing that then yes, I suppose you don't need to include the license.