> What? Just because of reputation? What are you even talking about... Is this a troll or some kind of rhetorical question? OP explained exactly his reasoning

> What? Just because of reputation? What are you even talking about... Is this a troll or some kind of rhetorical question? OP explained exactly his reasoning and clearly they said it was because of reputation. > Have you ever heard of "innocent until proven guilty"? It is not a court and Hans is not being tried on criminal charges, so what does that have to do with anything? Legal systems also have other standards for evidence such as balance of probability. > The burden of proof is on the accuser. We should be shown evidence, or Carlsen should apologize. What exact accusation did Carlsen make? A verbatim quote with complete context will be sufficient.