It's a pretty low-effort article, combining speculation with zero evidence, some boring old gripes about how chess has changed, and wrapping it all up with some

It's a pretty low-effort article, combining speculation with zero evidence, some boring old gripes about how chess has changed, and wrapping it all up with some crazy stretched analogy to poker and a conclusion that doesn't make sense for either poker or chess. An editor really should have canned this whole piece.