4 ms·
What's a more credible source, people on the internet with theories ? That's all i'm seeing here. There is plenty of precedent for Chinese or Russian state edi
by fortuna86 4y ago
What's a more credible source, people on the internet with theories ? That's all i'm seeing here.
There is plenty of precedent for Chinese or Russian state editorial interference in media, or the Murdoch's dictating Fox news talking points, I still see no evidence (that thing you are supposed to base your beliefs on) for Bezos interfering with WaPo. I do see a lot of conspiracies by people that don't like what WaPo publishes (Trump among them).
- asdff 4y agoI just think its a little naive to assume that there would not be any influence until some academic comes in with a meta analysis that suggest that there is a statistically significant degree of influence. It's best to believe that there could be influence one way or another with anything you read in media, because influence is massively profitable.