The point is that it's not a term invented by the author as the comment I replied to implied (and further, went on to accuse the author of doing it for sensatio

The point is that it's not a term invented by the author as the comment I replied to implied (and further, went on to accuse the author of doing it for sensationalism.) I didn't think I actually had to explain that, but I guess I should have expected as much when I got involved in the token "attack the piece's author over terminology and motives instead o of the actual points of the article" thread. Attacking something because it's "clickbait" or for its terminology instead of actually addressing its core positions is intellectual sloth.