7 ms·

Once again a conspiracy theory, as if that’s the only possible alternative to the rule of authority. Even if you trust that Covid-19 was dangerous (it wasn’t r

Once again a conspiracy theory, as if that’s the only possible alternative to the rule of authority. Even if you trust that Covid-19 was dangerous (it wasn’t really but hindsight, etc) and that every action of the regime was justified and in good faith (lol), what’s inappropriate about distrusting the authority on the next step? Especially when said authority had 1000 different contradictions in their rule that everyone could see but only those not willingly engaged in a political game of power. If you’re honest with yourself you know it’s not about truth anywhere as much as power and that no side of anything is righteous or even anywhere near honest.

mattwilsonn888 4y ago
Maybe we are misunderstanding each other - I don't starkly disagree with anything you've just said.
implements 4y ago
> Even if you trust that Covid-19 was dangerous (it wasn’t really but hindsight, etc) … In the UK: Killed 200,000 - would have got 500,000 without extraordinary measures and vaccination development. Are you using a definition of dangerous that somehow discounts mass casualties provided, I assume, younger people aren’t significantly affected and economic activity isn’t seriously disrupted?