4 ms·
The web app version would probably be 1/10th of that.
by postalrat 4y ago
The web app version would probably be 1/10th of that.
- miniBill 4y agoI mean... it depends what you want to support. My web calculator [fully client side] is 370kb of JS. It has features that this doesn't have (3d rendering, solving equations), but doesn't have code that this needs (mostly, the keyboard)...
- donkarma 4y ago
- pwinnski 4y agoOn the one hand, there's your claim that a web version of TwinCalc should be 56.3K or so. On the other hand, there's a world of existing web apps which are generally very much larger than that. A smaller footprint than 563K would be a dubious advantage for web apps in either case.