3 ms·
This is probably a good way to think about it, but it's not a straight scale of 0% good and 100% bad. There's a goldilocks zone in there, things above that are
by ryathal 4y ago
This is probably a good way to think about it, but it's not a straight scale of 0% good and 100% bad. There's a goldilocks zone in there, things above that are bad for instability, and things below are bad for lack of caution.
The rise is a correction that rates have been artificially low for 5-10 years, because the massive growth with no real risk assessment was addictive. If Fed rates get around 5% or more and they are still hinting at increases that's probably a bad sign for the long term. Short term instability already is happening.