2 ms·
Interesting historical footnotes, but without a handy AC power supply, even a rectifier isn't much use. Note that most (but not all) of Faraday's devices produc
by mikewarot 4y ago
Interesting historical footnotes, but without a handy AC power supply, even a rectifier isn't much use. Note that most (but not all) of Faraday's devices produced direct current.
Babbage's failure to ship a working product set back computing about 100 years.
- hinkley 4y agoPeople who are just slightly ahead of their time tend to have competitors, people who looked at the same world and have essentially the same idea, and then it's down to whether we think Liebniz or Newton invented it, or whether we confusingly credit one but rely on the techniques of the other (see also Edison & Tesla). I think history has unfortunately proven Babbage a dreamer. He had no contemporary who could swoop in and profit from his slow progress, because his work was not obvious/compelling to anyone else of his caliber.
- mannykannot 4y agoComputing as we know it (post Moore's law) depends on semiconductor technology. It is quite a stretch to suppose that, if Babbage had produced a working device, then the period of Moore's law expansion would have occurred 100 years earlier, given that it depended on the development of semiconductor devices, which in turn depended on developing a quantum theory of condensed matter.
- mikewarot 4y agoYou don't need quantum theory for transistors... I watched my chemistry professor explain how a diode, then a junction transistor worked back in 1982 at Rose-Hulman.