3 ms·
I hope not! If it becomes popular someone will wreck it by putting it on the jvm, replacing some of the parens with brackets, or something like that, creating
by abrax3141 4y ago
I hope not! If it becomes popular someone will wreck it by putting it on the jvm, replacing some of the parens with brackets, or something like that, creating an Algol-like syntax, adding some silly syntax to mark the macros, like an @, or something. Or even writing whole new programming languages on top of it. If any of that happen, I’ll have to go back to APL.
- sargstuff 4y agosee mbroderson 'Nope. ...' for episode II
- sargstuff 4y agoSo, how CLOSE does porting lisp awk [1] to run gawk version 5 under a jvm with it's @include macros to facilitate OO programing come to fulfilling the 'will go back to APL' requirement? [1] https://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/project/ai-repository/ai/lang/lisp/impl/awk/0.html https://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/project/ai-repository/ai/lang/...
- sargstuff 4y agoUmm.... more formalized mocklisp : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MList https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MList Using J would be more up todate & quicker to start up by 2 characters. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J_(programming_language) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J_(programming_language)