4 ms·
I don't understand your point, which effectively seems to be "not all games!" This is actually a zero sum scenario, games that are pay-to-win would have been s
by sennight 4y ago
I don't understand your point, which effectively seems to be "not all games!"
This is actually a zero sum scenario, games that are pay-to-win would have been something else had the concept not been popularized. Even games that are completely structured around these gambling mechanics... no, they wouldn't necessarily be different games in an alternate reality - they'd just be a different use of the dev's time. So maybe a birdhouse. Also, if this was a derail attempt - well done, I'm now thinking about carpentry instead of how much I dislike Apple.
- eropple 4y ago> I don't understand your point, which effectively seems to be "not all games!" It's more "capitalism dot txt is a thing, yes, but you're opting in." Which you can totally do. I am saying that this is a venue where you don't have to.