4 ms·

That would be leaving cash on the table.

• vsareto 4y ago
  There were consequences for taking that cash, as we see today with the need for loan forgiveness. If universities had kept tuition low, you might still have had government backed loans, but would not have needed loan forgiveness. I don't see how people can simultaneously be against government-backed loans existing, but also wanting universities to take as much from that system as possible to the detriment of society.
  • _-david-_ 4y ago
    >but also wanting universities to take as much from that system as possible to the detriment of society. I don't think anybody is saying universities should take as much as possible, only that it is to be expected. Because it is expected the government should not be enabling it. People have been asking the government to stop with these loans since the beginning saying this exact thing would happen.