17 ms·
>For certain replacement parts I can see this being important, like anything involved in Face ID or Touch ID. Those are secure elements. The back glass is not
by ChuckNorris89 4y ago
>For certain replacement parts I can see this being important, like anything involved in Face ID or Touch ID.
Those are secure elements. The back glass is not a secure element. That's just vendor lock-in malice for the sake of profiteering.
Edit: Since I can reply to your comments below, your argument fails flat because:
1) SW lock-outs also apply to genuine apple parts, not just aftermarket ones
2) If the user's ability to verify the originality of the parts installed in their phone was the real reason, they Apple could just have a prompt for the user that the new part is not genuine instead of completely locking it out.
- laserlight 4y agoThere's a charitable interpretation. Customers can now verify that the replacements are genuine Apple parts.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- selykg 4y agoI wasn't arguing that the back glass was a secure element. I said it makes sense for certain replacement parts and then gave examples of those surrounding Face ID and Touch ID. I would agree with you that the back glass is not one of those things. But as another person said, it is nice to know that they're official Apple products as that does matter to some people.