3 ms·
Knocking off 25% of a loan with compounding interest is vastly different than "pay all expenses in perpetuity for a selection of people, ~40% of the population
by falcolas 4y ago
Knocking off 25% of a loan with compounding interest is vastly different than "pay all expenses in perpetuity for a selection of people, ~40% of the population forever".
Conflating one with another is not arguing in good faith, IMO.
And frankly, that would be awesome. Did you know that about 40% of the population in the US is unemployed, voluntarily or involuntarily? The proposal is basically UBI, and that's perfectly fine by me.
EDIT: And why is it fine by me? Because I will eventually be one of those unemployed. Either intentionally or unintentionally, depending on how the die rolls. I'd love to know I won't be forced to panhandle or take up a menial job with a body destroyed by time just to put a roof over my head and food in my body.
- wonderwonder 4y agoWhy is it not comparable? Why is there a difference, in both cases certain people are getting selected for free money and the rest are being accused of being self centered and complaining while being forced to pay for it. A Ubi would be the death of capitalism and in turn the United States into a pauper nation.