4 ms·
I think the argument is that Figma might not exist in a world where such deals are blocked (or future Figmas may not come into existence if this deal is blocked
by ensignavenger 4y ago
I think the argument is that Figma might not exist in a world where such deals are blocked (or future Figmas may not come into existence if this deal is blocked), and thus would lead to more market harm than it would help. I'm not sure I agree with that reasoning, but it is plausible.
- dml2135 4y agoIf that is the case that means that investors cannot see themselves competing with established players in the market. That would be an indication that the current market dominators should be broken up, not that they should be allowed to acquire more companies.