It does raise interesting questions about what counts as decoration/formatting and what counts as part of the actual text. You could view these ocular O charac

It does raise interesting questions about what counts as decoration/formatting and what counts as part of the actual text. You could view these ocular O characters as purely decorative (like the fancy first character in a paragraph) but they could also be seem as a quirk of spelling which should be represented in unicode. But the multiocular O really does seem like one monk got bored one time and did some doodling.