30 ms·
I think we’re getting into conspiracy theory here. You’re arguing that $fact, and the only way $not-fact is argued is propaganda. This means any person who migh
by SamoyedFurFluff 4y ago
I think we’re getting into conspiracy theory here. You’re arguing that $fact, and the only way $not-fact is argued is propaganda. This means any person who might have a reason to argue for $not-fact is by default a propagandist. There’s no productive conversation to be had from this.
- WalterBright 4y agoThe productive part is realizing you've been flim-flammed. There's no other explanation for the government narrative to completely avoid the truth. Every fiat money government does this - it's not a conspiracy, it's just that it's in their best interests to blame inflation on speculators rather than their own profligate printing of money. I've presented many facts to support this. Economists know it, too. Study it and you'll see for yourself. Another part of the flim-flam is the government is always trying to promote the idea that inflation is good for the economy. Read their explanations. It's all nonsense.