4 ms·
(fyi — Firefox reader mode works) > Companies that relied on a “last hired, first fired” approach to layoffs for example, lost nearly 19% of their share of whi
by eganist 4y ago
(fyi — Firefox reader mode works)
> Companies that relied on a “last hired, first fired” approach to layoffs for example, lost nearly 19% of their share of white women in management and 14% of their share of Asian men, according to report which was published in the Harvard Business Review.
So this is a good point. Especially if a company made a ton of recent strides in advertising hiring in disadvantaged communities, cuts based on recency of employment would largely unwind a lot of that progress. And I expect randomizing it risks cutting employees the company actually wants to keep.
I hope twilio publishes their method e.g with HBR later on. It'll either be a good example to learn from and/or fodder for misguided lawsuits, but I hope we get to see their solution to the problem.
- drexlspivey 4y ago
- tgv 4y agoIt does make me curious how random it will be. If they're unwilling to put their top performers in the tombola (and they probably are), there will be a firing bias anyway.
- eganist 4y agoI'll guess: randomized among people who got below a certain review grade on their last one or two reviews.