Not even sure, I suppose young relatives of heavily at risk people will not have to pay for next jabs (assuming the other jabs also came at no cost, which I ass

Not even sure, I suppose young relatives of heavily at risk people will not have to pay for next jabs (assuming the other jabs also came at no cost, which I assume is true given Denmark's réputation, but I might be wrong.) My understanding (again, I might be mistaken) is they the correct headline should be "Denmark to focus booster campaign on at-risk people". (Which is much less clikbaity, I guess ;) ?)