There is no sane way to read this from their wording. First and foremost, discriminatory lay offs (i.e. ones targeting race, ethnicity, etc.) are illegal. So y

There is no sane way to read this from their wording. First and foremost, discriminatory lay offs (i.e. ones targeting race, ethnicity, etc.) are illegal. So you either perform lay offs "randomly", based on merit (these particular jobs are targeted first) or a mix of the two. If you have to add "Anti-Racist/Anti-Oppression lens" it means you filter candidate lists based on racist/oppressive criteria. Most probably this means that candidate list will be filtered in a way that end result of lay offs will target certain races, ethnicities, etc. more aggressively to make end result "Anti-Racist/Anti-Oppression", whatever that means by them. It might mean heavy lean towards white cishet males, might as well mean the opposite. What matters, though, that any way you look at it race/ethnicity/etc. becomes a criteria for lay offs, which is both racist and illegal. But yes, blame it on the "right wing"