FQA's got this covered: ======================== > Q: Why the same naming scheme as WSL? > A: It's a proof of concept name only. If I were to distribute this

FQA's got this covered: ======================== > Q: Why the same naming scheme as WSL? > A: It's a proof of concept name only. If I were to distribute this as a finished piece of software, which I probably won't (see why below) I would choose a different name. > Q: Isn't this literally just a QEMU virtual machine? How simple is that! > A: Yes, it is. And yes, it's simple. Why did I choose to put this on my Twitter, you ask? Because I couldn't find something exactly like what I did, and because before I posted it, I had 50 Twitter followers, total. I did not expect to get the over 700 likes that it did when I posted it; as a matter of fact, I would have been perfectly satisfied if it had gotten 7 likes. > Q: What, you won't be distributing this as a finished piece of software!? Why? > A: From what I can tell (and admittedly, I haven't tested this piece of software), it already exists. Lima seems to have a lot more features (such as file sharing, something that I have not implemented) and seems to be geared towards a different application (containers).