4 ms·
i agree with a lot of this; > I was not happy so see that my mouse felt laggy i also noticed this immediately and it was infuriating. my display runs at 240hz
by foxhill 4y ago
i agree with a lot of this;
> I was not happy so see that my mouse felt laggy
i also noticed this immediately and it was infuriating. my display runs at 240hz, so there must be at least 2, maybe even 3 frames of latency for it to be noticeable. it's made more perplexing that wayland was supposed to represent a reduction in latency.
> Out of the box, there’s a bit of that in wayland too, but sway has a way out: max_render_time.
this is possibly the worst way you could reduce input latency - mostly because of the tail-end of render times will be the most noticeable and the worst performing - please never do this unless you're trying to make your users inexplicably angry :)
> when really, other X servers exist, and have varying degrees of support for the extensions Xorg supports
a non-point here from me but i only know of XOrg and Xfree86, and i think the last time i tried that, linux kernels started with a two.. :)
- chrismorgan 4y agoYou’ve got ones like VcXsrv on Windows, which was particularly handy for running GUI stuff in WSL a few years back (before Microsoft provided a first-party solution in WSLg).
- badsectoracula 4y ago> a non-point here from me but i only know of XOrg and Xfree86, and i think the last time i tried that, linux kernels started with a two.. :) There is also Xenocara, but that is OpenBSD's Xorg almost-fork (they do track updates but also apply their own modifications).