4 ms·
when something needs to run day-in and day-out every day, it is difficult to justify swapping things just because they're old. as it turns out, old things have
by MAGZine 4y ago
when something needs to run day-in and day-out every day, it is difficult to justify swapping things just because they're old.
as it turns out, old things have stood the test of time and generally work quite well.
vancouver bc upgraded its own train control systems a handful of years ago. unsurprising to anyone who has tried to do a migration, there were service incidents. trains stuck in the middle of nowhere sort of thing.
It's all done, upgraded, and modernized yet. But there is a growing pain and growing cost. The tricky thing to know is when the juice is worth the squeeze.
- quake 4y agoNot to mention the amount of similarities between SkyTrain and BART with the automated system and custom parts. It didn't even strike me as odd that the trains didn't have drivers until a dump of snow hit the rails and someone had to open the front compartment of the train to access the manual controls to drive it into Columbia Station (why is it always Columbia?)