3 ms·
> Have you ever tried this? I've never had X11 network transparency be a good experience. I did, nearly 20 years ago. The computers were over 2500 km apart, th
by II2II 4y ago
> Have you ever tried this? I've never had X11 network transparency be a good experience.
I did, nearly 20 years ago. The computers were over 2500 km apart, though it was over a good university to university connection. The Gimp was certainly usable, though I will not go as far as saying it was good since 20 year old memories can be hazy and the standards of the day are different from the standards of today.
I also experimented with X over a 14.4 kbps modem a few years earlier. It was mostly while writing papers (plotting graphs and viewing dvi files, not the actual writing). It was slow, but it got the job done and was better than juggling documents between software on two computers.
The one really nice thing about X was the ability to use individual applications across a network connection, rather than dealing with an entire remote desktop. All of this remote desktop stuff strikes me as being better suited for accessing a remote system, rather than for running remote software.
- kaba0 4y ago> The one really nice thing about X was the ability to use individual applications across a network connection, rather than dealing with an entire remote desktop That sounds like a UX problem that’s quite trivial to fix, not a technical one and absolutely not inherent with Wayland.
- II2II 4y agoIf you're talking about shipping a singular rectangular region across the network, possibly. Yet not all windows are rectangular and many applications use more than one window. Then there are issues with how the application interacts with the desktop environment, where the application thinks it is being on computer A when it is actually being displayed on computer B. It is not a trivial UX problem.