> I feel the same way about systemd, its safe, reliable, and always a good choice for "dinner". > Basically I am saying that systemd has withstood the test of

> I feel the same way about systemd, its safe, reliable, and always a good choice for "dinner". > Basically I am saying that systemd has withstood the test of time and has never disappointed me. IMO, when you make a reference specifically to chicken tenders, there is an implication of childishness - implying that systemd is a bit of a toy implementation. It doesn't sound like you mean that particular interpretation. It would be the same if you mentioned red jello, milk boxes, capris suns, fruit snacks, or any other stereotypically children's food.