Yeah this is a good point. Compelled speech is a pretty new and undeveloped doctrine with unclear boundaries. The Court tends to defer to history as a way of u

Yeah this is a good point. Compelled speech is a pretty new and undeveloped doctrine with unclear boundaries. The Court tends to defer to history as a way of understanding how the framers viewed an issue so things like compelled testimony would likely be safe. My pet thought experiment is challenging the requirement to answer the census, particularly with it's much-expanded survey questions. Perhaps I can be compelled to say where I live and who lives with me, but can I be compelled to answer questions like whether any of us are gay?