Spared because he slightly cares. Slightly, or else why did he instigate the hostage situation in the first place? On a gradient you can say he cares about 0.00

Spared because he slightly cares. Slightly, or else why did he instigate the hostage situation in the first place? On a gradient you can say he cares about 0.001%. 0.001% rounds to 0 which is inline with what I said. On a fundamental level, we don't care. >It is very different what we know when we sit on the couch and muse about it, from what we know when we are directly engaged in a particular set of actions. You're musing too. And you mused the opposite of what I mused. I would say, my analysis goes beyond simple musing. It's evidence based. Observe the actions and inaction of the world and yourself. How much of your wealth have you donated to people in need? You have enough wealth to save dying people. There are definitely people in the US who need money to pay for chemo or some other treatment for some terminal disease. How much effort did you spend to find these people and donate a fraction of your wealth to save a life? None. People have already died because of your inaction. Entire complex stories have been already been lost... And does this inaction keep you awake at night? No. Because you don't care. And neither does anyone else. This is evidence that what I am saying is more inline with truth then simple musing.