5 ms·
> OP does not have the corporate experience to handle this situation Even before that, s/he doesn't even seem to understand any measure of business. $20m/year
by unity1001 4y ago
> OP does not have the corporate experience to handle this situation
Even before that, s/he doesn't even seem to understand any measure of business. $20m/year with 3 people is BIG. Any disturbance to whatever makes that happen will hurt the business greatly. When a full rewrite shakes the boat and causes a few millions of revenue loss or the loss of potential market share or opportunities, they will rightly fire him.
Best route would be to improve things without hurting anything. It doesn't matter things are 'properly done'. It matters whether the organization survives and prospers. What's 'proper' is redefined every 3-5 years, most of the time without objective basis anyway. So no need to hurt the business to force the current software paradigm.
- mgkimsal 4y agoIs the entirety of the whole company just 3 people? It doesn't sound like it. That 3 person team is just 'tech' it seems - there may be 5-10 managers/sales/support/etc people. And... $20m is revenue, not profit. If the cost of their sales is, say, $15m... and there's 15 people working at the company, that's quite healthy, but it's not some money-printing goldmine at this stage.
- unity1001 4y ago> Is the entirety of the whole company just 3 people? From what is told in the summary, it seems like the software stack and these 3 people constitute the core of the business that is going on. The business may be something totally different. But it seems to be running on that software. > And... $20m is revenue Even if they have lower margins than what you yourself imagined, $20 m revenue/year is still a gigantic amount. You can improve upon whetever margin or inefficiency in the process and increase the net profit - optimize vendors, costs, sales pipeline. The difficulty in modern Internet business is getting to some place at which you can command $20 m revenue from any market. Finding the customers and the users. Not the margins.
- sofrimiento 4y agoI’ve worked at a $100 million revenue online company that didn’t make any profit. OP says money is tight after covid, so seems like it the business is connected to a (physical) market that was affected by the pandemic. He says there is an extensive roadmap by a management team that are not familiar with the technical details, so it seems like the technology is not the core business. It’s not difficult getting to a high revenue fueled by aggressive and expensive acquisition using money from investors who gets dazzled by growth numbers, but if your customer lifetime value is low and you’re not a pure SAAS business which means margins won’t automatically improve with scale, turning that company profitable can prove very difficult.