3 ms·
You had me until the "groomer" version of "think of the children." Concern over safety (especially of the children) is a political weapon. A ridiculously overu
by drewcoo 4y ago
You had me until the "groomer" version of "think of the children."
Concern over safety (especially of the children) is a political weapon. A ridiculously overused one. I think that's part of why people react the way they do.
I am not a libertarian, but in recent decades safety has been the excuse for the erosion of our civil liberties in the US, so I can understand why their feathers would be ruffled by this.
I am not so sure safety is a thing we should value or work towards in general. I'd claim something like "well-being" on an individual and a group level would be more important. But safety and well-being are both still vague abstract generalities, so not terribly useful yet. We need stronger definitions or frameworks for those concepts and we need to talk about them as applied in specific instances.
- ajl666 4y agoSafety has become the battle cry of the fascist, the totalitarian, and it is the murderer of liberty. 'Safe' is as vulnerable to scrutiny as 'Game' or 'Good.'
- rgmerk 4y agoI agree that “think of the children” has been misused by power-hungry cops. I’m emphatically not saying that safety should be the only consideration when thinking about technology. But what I am saying is that preventing clear harms to people is important and undervalued by the (predominantly) relatively young men who start tech companies.