One other thing I'd like to point out. This is a very classic "the good of society balanced against the rights of the private citizen/organization". This isn'

One other thing I'd like to point out. This is a very classic "the good of society balanced against the rights of the private citizen/organization". This isn't about private corporate rights, it's about the good of society against those private corporate rights. You may disagree with where exactly this lands, but I doubt you disagree with the premise that personal rights must be balanced against the greater good (queue hotfuzz reference). If you think you do, ask yourself if you feel the very idea of hate speech shouldn't exist. There are those who do, but more typically, people just disagree with where that idea lands rather than the idea itself.