4 ms·
Holy shivers, guys! I've read about this on arstechnica.com and what surprised me the most is the amount of negative sentiment towards the absence of censoring.
by IYasha 4y ago
Holy shivers, guys! I've read about this on arstechnica.com and what surprised me the most is the amount of negative sentiment towards the absence of censoring. I highly doubt those are ordinary people writing comments. Most likely hired commenters or bots. (
I hope world's majority still appreciates freedom of communication.
- rightbyte 4y agoDunno if bots. Commenting when there is ranking votes quickly turns into a cesspool if there is a culture of "downvote to disagree".
- tux3 4y agoI can't tell if this is supposed to be taken literally, but I like that it's a sort of self-demonstrating comment. The decision seems like it makes it easier for bots who pretend to be humans to be protected as a side-effect, but in the same paragraph you suspect people of being bots. Damn bots, they're everywhere! :) (Full disclaimer: I've actually no strong opinion on the decision. I like freedom of speech, and I also like clean forum spaces free of manufactured consensus. Seems complex to predict the impact.)
- hot_gril 4y agoThey aren't bots. Don't make an accusation like that without a reason for it. (And I also disagree with the Texas law.)