4 ms·
If someone is desperate enough to steal food for their child, I'd rather have Kroger write off the loss than see a kid go hungry. I can't bring myself to think
by socialismisok 4y ago
If someone is desperate enough to steal food for their child, I'd rather have Kroger write off the loss than see a kid go hungry.
I can't bring myself to think that the other outcome (Kroger saves $3, child good hungry) is the just outcome.
Should we have great social safety systems that prevent anyone from going hungry? Yes. Do we? No.
So in the absence of support and safety nets, I'm just not going to fault anyone who is dealing with the stress of "my child is starving but I can't afford food" and decides to pocket a couple containers of mashed carrots and peas.
- _-david-_ 4y agoEvery state has support for children, pretty much every largish church will as well, along with thousands of charities. Children are the least likely people to be not have help. It is possible a parent doesn't know about these resources but they are there.
- kepler1 4y agoI feel the same way about your personal belongings, socialismisok. What does it hurt if someone steals your catalytic converter once in a while, or smashes your window in, or mugs you. Small inconveniences, oh well. They probably needed it more than you did. I volunteer your stuff to be donated to such charitable causes.
- socialismisok 4y agoI've had stuff stolen. Shit sucks. You know what though? Whoever stole that shit was in more desperate situation than I'm in. Insurance covered it, I moved on. Hardest part was the emotional burden of having someone in your stuff. Now, Kroger? Kroger doesn't have feelings. They won't care because they can't care. They write off the loss, same as if an employee broke a bunch of jars or as if they couldn't sell the product before it expired. Again, I'm not saying all theft is good. I'm saying some theft might not be inexcusable.