4 ms·
No you just loosened the definition of censorship to fit your terrible analogy, then you insulted the GP accusing them of doing mental gymnastics. You're projec
by hunterb123 4y ago
No you just loosened the definition of censorship to fit your terrible analogy, then you insulted the GP accusing them of doing mental gymnastics. You're projecting.
But since you do want to stick to the spam filter in your email box analogy I would like to propose a solution.
Would you prefer users be able to manage block lists, filters, and such themselves instead of content being removed for all users?
Do you really prefer this large social media oligopoly to have have final say in what the masses should see? Why not let the users manage what they see?
Do you feel the same way about all subjects? Do you support the right of ISPs blocking porn for example?
- IntelMiner 4y ago
- hunterb123 4y agoFirst off, I'm not the user you were replying to. Second, you're not really listening, you're just hurling insults and getting angry, that's not a healthy debate. You didn't attempt to answer any of my prompts. You didn't even attempt to clarify your definition or understand mine or the GPs. Sure maybe spam filter lists should be more open? I don't really disagree nor is it really relevant. It's whataboutism. Yes spam filters could be more user sided, but so could social media moderation. Do you agree or disagree with that?