(3) doesn’t come from (2), but (2) doesn’t negate (3) either. There are people in (1) who are desperate, when (2) occurs those desperate people freely choose th

(3) doesn’t come from (2), but (2) doesn’t negate (3) either. There are people in (1) who are desperate, when (2) occurs those desperate people freely choose this opportunity. Whether this opportunity is exploitative needs to be argued outside of (2) or (3). Here are two example of how society doesn’t allow certain freely chosen compensations schemes. (A) suppose one could offer money for organ donation, we would see increase in donations. As a society we do not allow it because it is exploitative. (B) More extreme, suppose someone could offer money for the right to kill a volunteer, with enough money I’m sure there would be volunteers, but we don’t allow that because it is also exploitative. The OPs (2) is less extreme than my (A) or (B), but I hope my examples show that (2) and (3) can be both true.