6 ms·
> iterate in img2img with loopback at approximately the same rate. What's the advantage of using img2img as opposed to iterating on the seed value?
by michaelchisari 4y ago
> iterate in img2img with loopback at approximately the same rate.
What's the advantage of using img2img as opposed to iterating on the seed value?
- PetahNZ 4y agoYou draw over the part of the image that is not ideal and get it to infill it
- brnaftr361 4y agoI guess it depends on how you do it. Depending on how I've set things up, I've found that more samples isn't necessarily better (usually just different). I suppose it's an optimization problem. I have found that I can pretty reliably look at a 1 sample image and kinda guess where the earliest iterations are going to go, and that might be the most appropriate workflow, actually, but beyond that it seems a couple of samples can drastically alter outputs, and likewise with prompt editing. Whereas with img2img there's a lot more control, I pick an input, I can force it to strictly abide to the image and the parameters I want, and as someone else said in- and outpainting are nice as well. I guess I'm just manipulating probabilities in my favor?