3 ms·
You can already block specific email addresses. With the amount of spam this will be a daily problem for you. Note -, I think spam is filtered before it even h
by themitigating 4y ago
You can already block specific email addresses. With the amount of spam this will be a daily problem for you.
Note -, I think spam is filtered before it even hits your account and goes to the spam folder however correct me if I'm wrong
- saurik 4y agoI don't understand your point or what you are responding to :(. The issue at hand is whether the concept of a spam filter violates the position of these laws, and I do not think it does as long as the spam filter is not a universal configuration that is forced on everyone. As long as you can either deactivate the spam filter entirely or whitelist specific senders (though I can make more elaborate arguments where this isn't quite sufficient due to bias) / specific content (which should be sufficient), then I believe that Google's spam filter is not the same thing as "moderation" which deletes or blocks the content for everyone, whether they wanted to see it or not.
- themitigating 4y agoIt was to your comment. Google blocks some spam messages before they reach your inbox and you can't disable this
- saurik 4y agoIn which case I am saying that that seems dangerous for them to be doing under this law, but that the concept of a spam filter isn't fundamentally broken and so people--such as the person I am responding to--who seem concerned that they won't be able to filter spam going forward are off-base, as I would think the spam filter need only be configurable (and, certainly, it would not prevent a third-party spam filter from existing).
- themitigating 4y agoIt is configurable in that if you don't like the spam filter you don't have to use the service