> This ruling only denies the right to censor based on viewpoint, something which I believe Starbucks is also bound by. In California this might be true, I bel

> This ruling only denies the right to censor based on viewpoint, something which I believe Starbucks is also bound by. In California this might be true, I believe political affiliation is a protected class in California. But political affiliation is not a protected class federally, so it should generally be legal for corporations to discriminate against people on the basis of political belief, as long as they don't do that in a way that could be construed as discriminating on the basis of something that is a protected class, like race.