2 ms·
Chronological is still fits the interface of a recommendation algorithm. You can take HN as an example of a recommendation service - while they remove things t
by 8note 4y ago
Chronological is still fits the interface of a recommendation algorithm.
You can take HN as an example of a recommendation service - while they remove things that are off topic, you'd have to argue that YC endorses whatever is in the #1 spot on HN.
- kelnos 4y agoWho is "they", though? Aside from the spam filters, posts largely make it to the front page (or not) due to community moderation. YC isn't the one making those endorsements, the moderating population of HN users as a whole are doing so.
- joshuamorton 4y agoThe HN mods routinely give posts they feel are interesting a second chance [0], and posts deemed "controversial" via a combination of human and automated factors are deranked. HN has more active, hands on moderation than most social media sites, and there's a stronger argument that dang "endorses" the front page of HN than that Steve Huffman "endorses" the front page of reddit. [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23239449 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23239449
- asdfasgasdgasdg 4y agoAnd at any rate, #1 on HN is not the product of any simple rule like "most upvotes per unit time with some decay function applied." There is significant judgment in expressed in the way that stories are ranked. The source code as of 2012 was enough to demonstrate this, but in my understanding yet more judgment has been applied since then. https://github.com/wting/hackernews/blob/master/news.arc https://github.com/wting/hackernews/blob/master/news.arc