3 ms·
The article says: >The largely 2-1 ruling by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals And at the end: >(This story corrects to largely 2-1 ruling in second para
by anon84873628 4y ago
The article says:
>The largely 2-1 ruling by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
And at the end:
>(This story corrects to largely 2-1 ruling in second paragraph)
I don't understand this. What does "largely" mean here? Was it a 2-1 decision or not? Why the qualifier?
- BCM43 4y agoOne of the judges issued a partial concurrence and partial dissent.
- eduction 4y agoFull opinions here: https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/21/21-51178-CV1.pdf https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/21/21-51178-CV1.pd... Each judge wrote their own opinion. You can see the first two judges are in agreement, the last writes, “ I concur with the judgment in Part IV of the majority’s opinion. I respectfully dissent from the remainder.” So they were 2-1, except for part IV, where they were 3-0. (I am confused about this part as I’ve read each section IV several times and it seems like they disagree here, one side arguing that the platforms are, and they other that they are not, entitled to pre enforcement relief. But IANAL.)