3 ms·
So you think it’s better to include a factor that is unknowable and whose inclusion has consistently led to wrong analysis when the exclusion of that factor wou
by addicted 4y ago
So you think it’s better to include a factor that is unknowable and whose inclusion has consistently led to wrong analysis when the exclusion of that factor would have historically led to better results?
- TigeriusKirk 4y agoI think it's better to make an estimate than to assume the decrease will continue indefinitely, yes. I do think that.