It doesn't say that- it only says that corporations restricting speech isn't itself an act of free speech protected by the 1st Amendment. Therfore that act of

It doesn't say that- it only says that corporations restricting speech isn't itself an act of free speech protected by the 1st Amendment. Therfore that act of censorship can be subject to govt regulations. >They go on to claim the 1st Amendment has a role to play in determining permissible restrictions on corporate censorship This ensures the said govt regs stay in the lane of common carrier regulation, and don't encroach into govt regulations that restrict speech based on the content. Which prevents the govt from outsourcing govt censorship to corporations via these types of regulations.