8 ms·
1. As I understand it, state constitutions are subordinate to the US constitution. In case of a conflict, the US constitution prevails. 2. "Disruption" is high
by tarakat 4y ago
1. As I understand it, state constitutions are subordinate to the US constitution. In case of a conflict, the US constitution prevails.
2. "Disruption" is highly subjective. On one end of the scale is spam, on the other end is political speech that platforms declare is "harmful". Do you think the mall in question could get away with booting the petitioners, as long as they could provide some vague reasoning to how their stated politics lead to "harm"?
3. You move from "endorsement" to "tone", I suspect because you realize no-one in their right mind believes Meta "endorses" every post on Facebook. But the point is valid - the tone of social media is more central to their business than the tone of a shopping mall. But what tone can a platform's billion+ users claim to share? And should their desire to shape a tone, at that scale, supersede their users free speech interest?